Louisville, KY

Stites & Harbison traces its roots to the 1832 establishment of a Louisville law firm by Judge Henry Pirtle, a pioneer in Kentucky's legal community and a partner of James Speed, who later served as U.S. Attorney General for President Abraham Lincoln. There are close to 90 attorneys in the Louisville office.
Kentucky Vastly Expands Data Center Tax Incentives
During the 2025 legislative session, the Kentucky General Assembly passed House Bill 775 (“HB 775”) expanding the sales and use tax exemptions for qualified data center projects in Kentucky. Eligible entities engaged in “qualified data center projects” are exempt from sales and use taxes on data center equipment, so long as the owner, operator, or colocation tenant makes the required minimum capital investments. Cassisdy Rosenthal takes a look at the Bill in this Stites & Harbison Client Alert.
Stites & Harbison Attorney Jackson Hurst-Sanders Selected for ELEVATE Kentucky Class of 2025
Leadership Kentucky recently selected Stites & Harbison, PLLC attorney Jackson B. Hurst-Sanders as one of 24 participants for the ELEVATE Kentucky Class of 2025.
Georgia Legislature Passes Hotly Debated Tort Reform Measures
Georgia’s Governor Brian Kemp made no secret that he would push for ambitious tort reform as part of this year’s state legislative agenda. Two Senate bills successfully made it through the session and await the Governor’s signature. The bills contain measures, which proponents and sponsors suggested were necessary to combat nuclear verdicts, reduce the costs of litigation, and control rising insurance premiums. Shannon Sprinkle and Evan Elam take a look at the bills in this Stites & Harbison Client Alert.
Sixth Circuit Wrestles with Meaning of “Weekly Basis” Under the FLSA
On April 1, 2025, in Lynwood Pickens v. Hamilton-Ryker IT Solutions, LLC, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals clarified what it means to pay a salary on a “weekly basis” under federal regulation 29 C.F.R. § 541.602(a) for purposes of classifying an employee as exempt from overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). In a divided opinion, the Sixth Circuit held that to be paid on a “weekly basis” means that an employee is paid for “a regular week’s worth of work.” As a result, the court held that an employer did not pay an employee on a “weekly basis”—and therefore owed the employee overtime—when the weekly guaranteed pay to the employee was only the equivalent of one day’s pay and the employee was paid an hourly rate for every hour worked beyond the first eight hours in the week.